
Often yes, and the decision is about consequences rather than tree health — the tree is usually thriving, which is precisely the problem. If the system is working and the tree sits at a reasonable distance, monitoring is a legitimate answer. If roots are confirmed in the laterals, removing the tree is the durable fix; cutting roots on one side is a half-measure that trades a plumbing problem for a stability problem, because severing structural roots on one side of a trunk is exactly how a tree ends up failing in the next storm. Root barriers work when installed before there is a problem, not after. The commonly cited planting guidance is to keep trees back from a field by at least their mature height, but any specific required setback is set by county health department rule — UNVERIFIED for any given Indiana county, and worth a phone call to that department before you plant or remove anything.
Years, quietly, and then all at once. Nothing here becomes dangerous in the tree sense — a tree over a drain field is not a falling hazard because of the drain field. What changes while you wait is money: the gap between removing a tree and repairing a field, versus removing a tree and replacing an entire system, and a failed field is among the more expensive repairs a house can present. If the property is going on the market, a failing field stops being a maintenance item and becomes a closing problem.